On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:17:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > I just realized that having this package may add load to the security > team by increasing the number of packages they need to rebuild. Normally > a kernel-image update uses the same package name as the current version > (thus no new kernel-latest is needed) but in the case of an ABI change, > this name changes. Of course, how often does a security update change the > ABI? I believe it did once w/ a ptrace exploit in woody.
Or the O_DIRECT fix. It'll happen as soon as things get nasty.
