Your message dated Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:26:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2004 16:25:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 20 09:25:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail1.krz.net [194.175.223.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BFy46-0006np-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:25:42 -0700
Received: from zdejens0030.dejen.krz.org (zdejens0030.dejen.zeiss.org
[10.2.39.51]) by kdejensmailhub.krz.org with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue,
20 Apr 2004 18:25:21 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serious Bug: FAT32
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Frank Klemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:25:00 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ZDEJENS0030/Server/Zeiss(Release 5.0.9a
|January 7, 2002) at
20.04.2004 18:26:24,
Serialize complete at 20.04.2004 18:26:24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: Kernel
--
Frank Klemm
AIM Advanced Imaging Microscopy
phone: +49 (36 41) 64-27 21
fax: +49 (36 41) 64-31 44
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Package:
- Kernel
Bug 1:
- When using FAT32 as file system on a 128 GB+ partition, you continuously
loss data.
Status:
- Serious, hidden data loss
Known background:
- It looks like directory entries are not updated correctly when there's
is
more than 128 GByte
used data on a FAT32 partition. You get files with a size of 0 bytes and
lost cluster clains.
No warning in log files. Often also the root directory of the partition
grows to fantastic sizes
(2...3 MByte for instance).
Other remarks:
- My experiences with Linux in the last 7 years show that systematic
testing is a serious problem
with Linux. When I bought my first 80 Gbyte HD, Linux was unable to
address 32+ Gbyte harddisks.
In the time where 300 Gbyte HD are available, still 128 GB+ is untested.
There must be systematic tests with up-to date hardware, currently there
should be all file systems
tested with partitions greater than 2^31 (RAID 0, 4xATA 300 GB) and
greater than 2^32 blocks
(RAID 0, 7xATA 300 GB). Fixing bugs when users trap into it is much too
late.
Bug 2:
- FAT32 Filenames which can be stored as 8.3 and which have no lower case
letters (ABBA, UB40, U2, TIPA)
are displayed wrong.
Status:
- No critical, but really ancient
$ mkdir ABBA
$ ls
abba
$ ls ABBA
ABBA
$ ls A*
No such file or directory: A*
$ rmdir A*
No such file or directory: A*
$ ls -la ABBA
ABBA
$ cd ABBA
$ pwd
/Audio/Artists/ABBA
$ ls ../A*
No such file or directory: ../A*
$ _
--
Frank Klemm
AIM Advanced Imaging Microscopy
phone: +49 (36 41) 64-27 21
fax: +49 (36 41) 64-31 44
mailto:f.klemm<-at->zeiss.de
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244915-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 16:26:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 19 09:26:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from verein.lst.de (mail.lst.de) [213.95.11.210]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BxpkO-0004Hn-00; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:26:40 -0700
Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i7JGQc95027362
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:26:39 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i7JGQcoZ027360
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:26:38 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:26:38 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
The patch that fixes this has been in both 2.4 and 2.6 for a while.
