On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:54:45PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:47:42PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote:
> > 
> > Accepted:
> > kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> >   to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> > kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> >   to 
> > pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> > kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2.diff.gz
> >   to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2.diff.gz
> > kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2.dsc
> >   to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2.dsc
> > kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> >   to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> > kernel-tree-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> >   to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-tree-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
> > Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
> 
> Does this mean I have to build and upload the m68k images again against this
> kernel-source?

Only if the changelog shows something relevant to security or m68k. If it
contains only alpha related fixes for example, no need.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


Reply via email to