Your message dated Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:21:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mkinitrd needs "raidtool2 OR mdadm" for RAID arrays
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2004 11:30:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 29 04:30:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oceanite.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.1.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bq97V-00060n-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:30:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (oceanite.ens-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1])
by oceanite.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA533201FD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from oceanite.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (oceanite [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 25079-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from itqiy.cri2000.ens-lyon.fr (itqiy.cri2000.ens-lyon.fr
[140.77.110.41])
by oceanite.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA071320186
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: mkinitrd needs "raidtool2 OR mdadm" for RAID arrays
From: Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.72
When installing on a soft raid array, mkinitrd needs a valid
/etc/raidtab but the error message says it needs raidtools2 (in
mkinitrd in, get_raid_raidtools, l183).
This is confusing (and debian-installer team got confused) since
installing mdadm do the jobs of creating the raidtab whereas installing
raidtools2 does not create the raidtab.
So I suggest the error message is changed plus initrd-tools suggest
mdadm in is dependency.
SEb
--
Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261984-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 16:23:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 09:23:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuCw6-000269-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:23:46 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2ABF064D40; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8D76210148; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:21:44 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:21:44 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mkinitrd needs "raidtool2 OR mdadm" for RAID arrays
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-08 11:00]:
> Did d-i not install mdadm for you? What was the exact error message
> you received, and can you reproduce this bug?
This was a bug in older verisons of d-i and not in initrd-tools (the
submitter confirms it works with recent d-i, see #261987). Closing.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
