On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:28:31AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I'd be inclined to push this kind of thing in general to the generic >> package so long as no generic code is affected.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 03:51:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Yes, but this means a potential need for new upload of all the kenrel-image > packages. Altough it is true that it isn't necessary to always have the latest > kernel-source to build. This will be necessary for major security issues, e.g. CAN-2004-0415, anyway, so I think we'll be okay. The bit about latest kernel-source is rather hopeful; if we take this as a precedent for architectures to update generic kernel-source without updating other architectures' kernel-images, then quite a bit can be done in the future. On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:28:31AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Let me do a closer review and I'll send in another followup. On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 03:51:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok. My idea was that all thing that are (or are supposed to be) pushed > upstream, can go in the kernel-source package. This would be great. Is it pending in the linux-ppc tree already? -- wli
