On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:31:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:57:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Yeah, in the meantime, i need to release a 2.4.26 kernel as there are > > people clamoring for it, since the 2.4.25 has some security holes whose > > fixes where not backported, and 2.6 is not considered stable by some > > users yet (and if you want to fight it, you are welcome to engage in a > > flamewar with Branden, i certainly won't :). > > > > The patch from 2.4.26 -benh tree apply cleanly but doesn't build > > (probably because of two conflicting libata patches, but maybe because > > some other bits and pieces), and altough i worked at it some, it is > > still failing with : > > > > fs/fs.o(.text+0x119cc4): dans la fonction ? syncd ?: > > : undefined reference to `sigmask_lock' > > fs/fs.o(.text+0x119cdc): dans la fonction ? syncd ?: > > : undefined reference to `__recalc_sigpending' > > fs/fs.o(.text+0x119ce0): dans la fonction ? syncd ?: > > : undefined reference to `sigmask_unlock' > > > > Could you (or someone else) have a look at the stuff ? The patch against > > kernel-source-2.4.26 is at : > > Hmm, this looks like xfs_super.c doesn't pick up xfs_buf.h. I'll look > at this in more detail tomorrow.
Ok, thanks, Friendly, Sven Luther
