On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > So far, all the patches have been tested on a small scale and found to > be working. If you have the time, please let me know whether each > patch in its present form should > > a) stay where it is indefinitely > b) stay where it is now and included upstream eventually > c) thrown out and replaced by something better
airport.diff The latest orinoco now has monitor/scanning support in a way upstream maintainers are okay with it. So either drop this patch or replace it with latest upstream. Sooner or later we want this in the all debian kernel packages, either via upstream or if that doesn't happen soon by moving it to kernel-patch-debian. asfs.diff Should go upstream sooner or later but need works. IMHO should be dropped and made into kernel-patch-asfs ksyms.diff Already upstream in 2.6.7-rc1 pegasos.diff Arch/ppc part should go upstream, although upstream told me on irc they remember they weren't happy with the last version they got, so it might need work. Maybe the patch author (Sven?) could ask for review on linuxppc-devel again? radeon-ibook.diff Ben promised to get this merged upstream soon. Keep it until then. serial.diff Shouldn't go upstream. We need a better way to fix this issue.
