On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 12:41:00PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:17:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Well, in this case, you could have CCed the list, but the bug report is > > the way to go for not getting the information lost. > > > > BTW, to the new kernel maintainer team, would it make sense to set the > > maintainer field of all the kernel packages to this list ? This would be > > a good way to achieve better integration, altough it may pollute the > > list also. > > > > BTW it has been already proposed for next uploads. > > Again, could we adopt tagging subject with [PATCH] for all patch proposals > in this list, in order to have some hints for browsing? This is > consistent with LKML policy.
Patches should go to the BTS anyway, not to the list. If the maintainer is set to the list, then we will get bug reports and other such traffic here, so adding a [BTS] or other tag could probably be automatically added, not sure though, but then maybe the BTS messages are easily identifiable anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther
