On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:20:42AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote: > > Mon 2005-01-31 at 13:30 +0300 Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:41:31PM +0100, Joachim Nilsson wrote: > > > > [1] - http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/01/msg00171.html > > > Is gconfig even maintained upstream? > > Dunno, but 2.6.10-ac5 has the following changelog entry that might > > be worth taking a closer look at: > > * Make gconfig work with current gtk 2.4 (J Magallon) > That is interesting indeed. I have attached the associated patch. > Could you take a moment to see if it resolves the problem > as well as your patch does.
The bk patch does solve the errors. It does this mainly by removing the use of custom icons for single|split|full view and replacing them with (imo badly chosen) stock icons. I.e., the patch focuses on solving the runtime errors, the annoying warnings remain. My patch otoh keep the original icons, the same as are used in the xconfig/kconfig toolbar. I do this with replace_button_icon(), which is a new function that replace missing icons from the .glade file. On top of that I also sneeked in a segfault fix on lines @@ -851,9 +851,12 @@ to grey out the back button in single mode. It is necessary to handle if the user changes from a deeply nested place in split mode to single mode and then presses back. I know I'm not exactly impartial here, but the bk patch is ugly. Maybe we should let our patch flow upstream? Regards /Jocke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
