Thank you for this elaborate explanation, Aurélien.
"Aurélien COUDERC" <couc...@coucouf.fr> schreef op 18 augustus 2024 23:04:10 UTC: >TDLR : >*DON’T* upgrade to : >- libkf5globalaccel* version 5.115.0-6 >- libkf5plasma* and plasma-framework version 5.115.0-5 >it will break. > >*WAIT FOR* : >- libkf5globalaccel* version 5.115.0-7~exp1 >- libkf5plasma* and plasma-framework version 5.115.0-6~exp1 > > >Longer explanation: > >I uploaded a set of changes to some kf5 packages today to ensure >coinstallability with their qt6 counterparts. That was needed because we start >having packages relying on kf6 like Digikam and we want them to be installable >without requiring experimental. > >The issue that I overlooked is that there were actually 2 sets of kf5 packages >that need updates for coinstallability : >- ones that stayed in kf6 for their Qt6 version => these were OK to upload >- ones that moved to *Plasma* for the Qt6 version, which is the case for >kglobalaccel and plasma-framework (now called libplasma) => these were *NOT >OK* to upload now because Plasma 6 is not in unstable yet. > >So I have reverted the changes to kglobalaccel in version 5.115.0-6 and >plasma-framework 5.115.0-5 in unstable to keep all packages installable in >unstable. >The unpleasant side effect is that if you install these versions in parallel >to their Plasma 6 counterparts, it will break. > >So please ensure you upgrade directly to libkf5globalaccel* version >5.115.0-7exp1 and libkf5plasma* and plasma-framework version 5.115.0-6~exp1 if >you don’t want dpkg to break on file conflicts. > >That’s why they call it experimental after all… > > >Happy hacking, >-- >Aurélien > >
