[adding pkg-kde-talk@alioth-lists to the thread, where we discuss packaging 
topics]


Le 9 mai 2022 20:10:19 GMT+02:00, ValdikSS <i...@valdikss.org.ru> a écrit :
>Hello, mailing list.

Hi ValdikSS,

>Is there any chance to get kpart-webkit package into newer Debian versions? 
>https://packages.debian.org/stretch/kpart-webkit
>
>This package allows to use Webkit renderer in Konqueror browser. This renderer 
>is outdated and not compatible with all the websites, however it is much 
>faster and lower on RAM consumption than modern WebEngine used by default. 
>This would allow to browse the web using very low-end machines by current 
>standards, such as 32-bit PCs with 512 MB RAM.
>
>Debian is basically the only major Linux distribution which still supports 
>i386, and there's Webkit packaged for Surf and Qutebrowser packages, and it's 
>even present as a module for KDE Frameworks (libkf5webkit5), but it can't be 
>used in Konqueror due to missing kpart.
>
>Kindly asking to bring old kpart-webkit package from Stretch to newer 
>Bullseye, to extent the lifespan of older hardware. Surf and QuteBrowser still 
>could be used, but that browsers are aimed at keyboard controls, not a regular 
>interface such as Konqueror.

The package was removed from Debian for a specific reason : it's dependency on 
Qt4 :
https://tracker.debian.org/news/902784/removed-134-2-from-unstable/

Since it seems to have been ported to Qt5 / KF5 in the meantime I see no 
technical reason why it shouldn't be reintegrated into Debian.

However this is still a relatively niche use case and the Qt/KDE Team in Debian 
is generally more interested in on-boarding more contributors than more 
packages. 😉

So if you want to see it back I'd advise you fork the repo and start getting 
the package up to date with upstream and Debian standards, so we can review and 
upload your work to the archive. Feel free to join #debian-qt-kde on IRC and 
ask for help/review.

>P.S. libkf5webkit5 package description says it provides kpart component, which 
>is does not. Could it be the whole reason of missing webkit in Konqueror?

The description is purely … hem … descriptive. I'll have a look at what's in 
the package and fix the description accordingly.


Happy hacking !
--
Aurélien

Reply via email to