Thank you to your answer. Le lundi 20 février 2017, 15:54:59 CET Maximiliano Curia a écrit : > ¡Hola MERLIN! > > El 2017-02-20 a las 15:01 +0100, MERLIN Philippe escribió: > > I know Debian package is frozen, but actually the Sddm package is bugged. > > It ignores the instructions given in the /etc/sddm.conf file as HideShells > > or HideUsers. These bugs are serious, the next version of Debian should > > not contain these errors. > > Were these bugs reported? I have not yet submitted these bugs. I have searched with Google and I found bugs dated April 2016 reporting from other Linux the incriminated version was the 0.13.0 following the thread of the discussion it was corrected but i don't know how. With the version of sddm 0.13.1 of Debian Sid and an excerpt : [Users] DefaultPath=/bin:/usr/bin HideShells=/usr/sbin/nologin,/bin/false,/bin/sync HideUsers=dirmngr,speech-dispatcher,postgres,smbguest MaximumUid=60000 MinimumUid=0 I found myself with all users /bin/false or /bin/sync despite the HideShell parameter and also the users i named in the HideUsers parameter. In version 0.14.0 of experimental I no longer have any worries. > > In experimental its OK. >
> > Anyway, I'm preparing 0.14 for sid, which includes the desktop-base > integration. > > This change needs the approval of the release team, if they > consider that the new version is not required we would need to backport the > bugfix changes of the 0.14 version, do you know which change fixes these > issues? I hope that the release team will say OK. Philippe Merlin
