MTP is a must-have. Simultaneously accessing data from a PC and a phone isn't a hard sell. The options have already been laid out here among everyone's angst. There's a freeze policy and one can help with a backport. This must-have must be had later or separately.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Pavel Mihaduk <le...@nixkid.com> wrote: > The problem is that you take exactly the same position, _demanding_ KDE > 4.10 in wheezy just because _you_ consider MTP support a must-have. > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:09:42 +0600 > Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@wrar.name> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:55:14AM +0300, Pavel Mihaduk wrote: > > > Andrey, > > > > > > Have you ever tried to read what other people wrote? There's a > > > package freeze policy > > Have *you* tried to read what other people wrote and notice *who* > > writes *what*? > > > > > which defines the procedures quite clearly; besides, > > > Qt-KDE team is not that big and it's hardly possible they'll manage > > > to package and push KDE 4.10 till wheezy release. > > I know. > > I just don't like when people write silly and/or wrong things on > > matters they do not understand. > > And while "we are frozen and you may wait for a backport" is a valid > > argument, "I didn't see such devices so I think you are wrong" or "I > > am not convinced that MTP as a protocol is useful" are not. > > > > > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:33:35 +0600 > > > Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@wrar.name> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:46:24PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Debian 7.0 (upcoming "Wheezy") needs MTP support in it's > > > > > > > > KDE in order to be relevant. > > > > > > > Honestly: I don´t care. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I understand the sense behind MTP in not having to *mount* a > > > > > > > device. But from what I have seen regarding MTP I am not > > > > > > > very convinced about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > How is this opinion relevant here? It's the only option. > > > > > > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > > > > > Even if you state your oppinion as a matter fact here, it is > > > > > still just an oppinion. Cause you didn´t state and prove any > > > > > facts in this thread so far. > > > > > > > > > > So how is your oppinion relevant here? > > > > > > > > > > I tried to explain you something. I got the impression you > > > > > didn´t even listen. > > > > > > > > > > I do not see a reason to waste another second of my life on > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > Thread set to ignore. > > > > Typical. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/20130208172119.4e531...@mihaduk-laptop.corp.wargaming.local > >
