[Mike Bird - Montag 10 Mai 2010 14:38:59] > On Mon May 10 2010 05:14:57 Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > So far most of the "discussion" has been whining about where KDE 4 is > > perceived to be worse than KDE 3.5 and whining that "somebody should please > > do something". > > KDE 4 has far more problems - both conceptually and in > implementation - than KDE 3.5.
How is this measured? > I wasn't aware that KDE 4 > had received an exemption from discussion of problems. You do not dicuss problems. You just repeat and repeat and repeat that KDE 4 is wrong and the devs are wrong and that KDE 3 is better. > Every > other package in Debian seems able to stand the heat. Oh, have you already been to the Apache folks telling them, Apache 1.3 was better and they should package it instead of the very very wrong Apache 2? I think the reaction will be the same in almost every project. > Nevertheless the KDE 3.5 users are not trying to block KDE 4 > in any way. It is the KDE 4 true believers who are obstructing > KDE 3.5 at every opportunity. If you were able to convince the KDE packagers to re-package KDE 3.5, it would be a bad day for KDE 4, so yes, we (as in the ones who like to see KDE 4 grow up) care. > Now if you have nothing useful to say about KDE 3.5, please > stop trolling this thread. Who decides what is "useful"? It us udeful for KDE if everybody would just focus on improving KDE 4 instead if digging up corpses. Anyway, good luck. Maybe you should try contacting the ones that are still working on KDE 3 (Trinity, vectorlinux, ...) and move this discussion there. Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005101446.21969.schwarz...@gmail.com
