On Saturday 06 March 2010 10:33:46 George Kiagiadakis wrote: > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jan De Luyck <j...@kcore.org> wrote: > > On Saturday 06 March 2010 07:05:58 Mark Purcell wrote: > >> On Friday 05 March 2010 19:17:28 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > >> > If I were to rebuild digikam for KDE 4.4.1 SC, which version string > >> > should I use? 2:1.1.0-1 as in unstable or 3:1.1.0-1 or what? I just > >> > ask in case anyone else wanted this, for my local installation I do > >> > not care that much. > >> > >> A package of digikam rebuilt against experimental-snapshots is available > >> at: http://people.debian.org/~msp > >> > >> I will upload this fixed digikam to experimental once KDE 4.4.1 his > >> experimental. > > > > Thanks Mark. > > > > Any chance of getting amd64 packages? Or any pointer to where I can find > > libkipi7-dev and libkdcraw8-dev? > > Just rebuild the source package that is on this page for amd64. The > libkipi7-dev and libkdcraw8-dev have been renamed, so you need to > rename them in the Build-Depends field of debian/control if you build > from the source package that is in unstable. See > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-commits/2010-March/018157. > html
They have been renamed to libkipi-dev and libkdcraw-dev They both provide the build dependencies so there should be no need to change something in the control file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003061044.32243.catd...@tuxzone.org
