Achim Schaefer: > > it seems that something is severely broken with digikam in unstable > > atm (at least on my box ;-). > > I' using as well mainly unstable, but e.g. qt 4.6 from experimental. > BTW I'm using the i386 architectur.
And digikam goes up to 95%+ for at least 30min? (I stoped it after 30 min...) > > > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly. > > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem. > > > > Therefore, can anyone confirm the behaviour? > > Sorry, but the behaviour is as normal as it should be. Can you perhaps elaborate a little bit on your theory that any kind of software might eat 95%+ cpu while idle without being considered as severely broken?! (sorry for my poor English) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
