El Domingo, 8 de Febrero de 2009, Arthur Marsh escribió: > Anyway, I was lead to believe that kde 4.X would not be slower than kde > 3.5.X.
You are comparing Okular with KDPF, aren't you? This doesn't have to do with comparing KDE 3.5 with KDE 4.x. Okular started with the KPDF codebase, but it's really different in many ways. For example, Okular uses libpoppler to render PDFs, but KPDF uses xpdf. > What is the best way to achieve a fast, fully-documented pdf reader for > kde 3.5.X under Debian? That depends on what you mean with "for KDE 3.5.x". If you mean a PDF reader done with KDE 3 libraries, then it's KPDF. However, I strongly recommend Okular, as it's a better application in general. Even if it uses KDE 4 libraries, it's perfectly usable on a KDE 3 desktop. I've been using it since a _lot_ time ago, and to me it's perfectly stable. Although I understand that if you found one important PDF for you that makes Okular choke, then you will have a bad impression. I suggest that you use Okular, and report bugs that you find. Also note that the PDF you linked to is badly served (blame Microsoft's IIS), since it says "Content-Type: .PDF", instead of application/pdf. -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
