Hi, ketvirtadienis 04 Rugsėjis 2008, Ben E. Hard rašė: > I know that it is only an additional feature and that Ana doesn't want to > provide the "best possible KDE 4.1 desktop experience" in Lenny. But why > shouldn't he or somebody else provide a good experience with some more KDE4 > programs for Lenny? > Why not? Why that fundamentalism? Don't you want to leave it to Ana which > packages he includes? I'm just expressing my opinion and not objecting to anything (as I'm not actually doing backports). Backporting is quite a time consuming job. Having an app A backported will rise a question why B or C can't be backported. However, Ana has already replied that she is considering including yakauke in backports.
> Why do you think it is without support? Of course there is no official > support of debian, but Ana kindly responds to that mailinglist. I did not mean such support. Your request is actually a perfectly valid support request (old software does not work with KDE4, you want a newer version) also. Frankly, you give a pretty good reason as KDE3 version is completely unusable. > Of course, but I have the feeling that these backports are meant to help > testing users to use KDE4 right now before Lenny is released. The backports > won't include anything after KDE 4.1.x (so are the plans according to > kde4.debian.net), as the backports will be useless once official > KDE4-packages appear in testing. These are Lenny backports (so they are more "future stable" backports than testing backports). You can be pretty sure that it will take a while until KDE 4 migrates to testing after it enters unstable. But backports will stay Lenny not Squeeze ones during that period. -- Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
