Derek Broughton wrote: > I'm not sure why you're committed to mbox - especially since you talk > about IMAP.
Well, i am accustomed to mbox; moreover sometimes it happens to check mail folders without the imap server (i am using dovecot) > It is not safe to have multiple programs processing an mbox file. Do you mean that concurrent access is not managed properly by the imap server? >> As an alternative solution, would it be safe to symbolic-link folders >> shared by kmail and thunderbird (through the imap server) >> to .kde/share/apps/knode/folders ? > Definitely not if they're mbox. So are you suggesting to switch to maildir? >>>> I also would like to access such file through my local imap server, as >>>> kmail do. Will that be possible in a next knode version? >>> I really doubt that. > Interestingly, yes. I just copied a newsgroup message into my IMAP inbox, > and opened it with KMail. No problem. So, you certainly could manually > copy messages to a KNode local folder - which is mbox - then either read > that file into KMail or move it directly to an IMAP server that handles > mbox files (dovecot does, I'm told). > So, shouldn't be the same as linking an mbox file handled by dovecot to the knode local folder? thank you --pol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
