El Viernes, 30 de Julio de 2004 04:32, Chris Cheney escribió: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:29:26AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi. > > > > > I really belief that it would be better to include a bug fixed kde 3.2 > > > than a buggy kde 3.3. > > > > FWIW, I'm also in favour of including 3.2.3 rather than 3.3.0. Each new > > 3.x release seems to (understandably) begin with a number of annoyances > > that are ironed out over the BRANCH releases, and debian is certainly > > known for shipping old and solid over new and flaky. > > Well current konqueror in sid which is actually newer than 3.2.2 since > it has branch fixes, still crashes on my hourly. So far konqueror in KDE > 3.2.92 hasn't crashed on me yet. So I guess you just have to weigh out > which is better, something that has known bugs vs bugs we don't about > yet...
The release schedule of 3.3 is shorter than the one of 3.2, so I suppose it includes less changes than previous releases, and there will be less surprises, I hope. And if the next release after 3.3 will be KDE 4, it's possible that the 3.3 branch will be better mantained than the 3.2 one. Just my two cents. :) -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) - GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://darkshines.net/ - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
