On Saturday 03 April 2004 21:21, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > On Saturday 03 April 2004 20:20, Jeff Coppock wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 18:44:41 +0200 > > Hi, > > > Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am Saturday 03 April 2004 12:00 schrieb Mauro Darida: > > > > I was a fan of kmail but left it for mutt since it does not work > > > > well with procmail > > > > <snip> > > > > Just outta curiosity, what do you need from Procmail that the Kmail > > fitering can't provide? > > for starters, case insensitive match, if you need it. For other more > advanced things see 'man procmailrc' and 'man procmailex'. > Use regular expression in KMail.
> Another thing is the more user friendly configuration of procmail. To setup > filters with GUI-dialogs is no fun. > I agree 100% in that. We should really start a wish-item for text-file configured filtering in Kmail and vote for it. > Last but not least is procmail one example of the well known unix > philosophy. IIRC 'One (excellent) tool for one job'. Because of that, k3b > uses cdrecord/cdrdao instead of implementing own burning code. > And because of it k3b is always slightly wrong and acts wierdly. In reality k3b uses cdr-tools because there currently are no good libraries for burning. `Allan
