There are many times that the appearance of KDE dialogs or other KDE windows 
are distorted.  The dialogs may be too narrow for the text, borders may be 
misaligned by one pixel, the text-entry areas may not be sufficiently wide or 
tall for the size of the window (this is especially true on pop-up messages), 
or other subtle errors.

I think what I've described above are actually Qt errors.  I recently purchased 
the book, "Programming Qt with C++", so as I read this question may answer 
itself.  I ask these questions as I have several projects and would like to use 
"proper and accepted" coding standards.

Proceeding, I think the the occurences described above are resulting from a 
lack of inter-object communication.  Example:  In a dialog, the text area will 
use a certain font.  Every object within the dialog should be aware of every 
font face and font size used with the dialog and able to adjust itself 
accordingly for greatest aesthetics.  The size of the dialog can be adjusted so 
that: 1) The windows is correctly sized with attractive borders, OR 2) The text 
is drawn in a scrolling field that the user can manipulate to view the entire 
text.  You get the idea.

The Macintosh platform is renowned for the cleanliness and efficiency of it's 
interface.  If this phenomena is not Qt-related, it is possible for the KDE UI 
to approach this landmark?  Perhaps more attention should be payed to 
inter-object communication?

In no way am I trolling or otherwise insulting KDE.  I was a Macintosh user 
back when the platform was based on the Motorola 68xxx (Mac, Mac Plus, Mac 
Centris) chip and now I use a home-built PC, Linux, and kernel 2.6.  I have 
noticed these minor errors in KDE 3.2 and I'm sure they will be changed in 
future releases.

At the user-interface site, "AskTog", it is mentioned that the reason the menus 
don't activate on border-clicks but instead have a one-pixel separation from 
the edge is a Qt problem that is being worked.

Is what I've described an issue of KDE or Qt?
----------
The content of the message is a reflection only of the writer and not of my 
employer, AT&T, or Tybrin.

Robert Tilley
321-785-2010
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to