On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:01:14AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am the maintenair of k3b. > > Could you please explain what's the rationale of splitting k3b in several > packages? Seems that k3b libraries are used only by k3b itself, and none of > the k3b packages is architecture-independent. Isn't it better to put > everything in a single package?
Yes, I'm actually surprised that the ftp admin team let it through. They have rejected similiar things in the past. To be honest it looks like their _NEW_ processing isn't happening right now and things are being immediately accepted into the archive, which is probably not a good idea. I uploaded a meta-kde package that should have been marked NEW and it wasn't and instead went directly in. Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
