so I have to apologise you for misunderstanding. .. I didn't read your mail properly..
;-) > > > I did go back an have a look - at there was a message saying that kmail > > > could not be compiled for other architectures because of a qt problem. > > > It was also stated later in the thread that the qt problem had been > > > fixed. > > > > > > All this was 11th/12th Feb. > > > > > > Is there something else holding it up? > > > I think you misunderstand. I am aware there are lots of references to this, > and to where to get alternate packages (that I am using). What I was > refering to were specific comments about the reason these packages were not > making sid and these were given on the 11th Feb (by Daniel Stone) in which he > said that there was a problem with qt preventing further loading of kde3.1. > On the 12th Feb he reported that this problem had been fixed. > > Given that was 11 days ago, I would have expected the logjam to have been > removed and was just asking (without trying to put anyone under pressure:-) ) > whether there was some other reason why kmail (and the other packages) were > not making it into sid. -- Vladimir Wiedermann
