On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 00:17, Ben Burton wrote: > Perhaps I should just bite the bullet and put a 4: epoch on all of the > packages that are going into sid. Though in general there have been so
Yes, that is the best thing to do. When I started maintaining KDE packages some of them had an epoch of 4: and I made the mistake of copying that to other packages (and this was included in the KDE CVS). It seems that many other people involved with building KDE packages have done the same, so I think it's too late to try and go back. We can try and avoid having new packages with an epoch, but for the current ones keeping an epoch of 4: is the only option. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
