-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> <BEGIN FORM LETTER>

Yes, yes, I *know* we don't support these packages, etc etc etc, but that 
doesn't mean it's not worth coordinating to avoid these problems where 
possible.

There's also the selfish motivation that whilst at the moment we get posts to 
the list which anyone can deal with or ignore as they please, when it starts 
going through the BTS it becomes my personal responsibility (for the modules 
I maintain), and though I agree we don't support this that whatever, I don't 
particularly like just slamming the door on people.  So I'm keen to see as 
few problems as possible arise in the first place. :)

And when you reiterate that it's fine to politely redirect them to debian-kde 
or whatever and close the bugs, I'll reiterate the first paragraph above. :)

b.

- -- 

Ben Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The man who sees both sides of a question is a man who sees absolutely
nothing at all.
        - Oscar Wilde

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9mBQGMQNuxza4YcERAgOTAJ9bVbdE90zMZHftHQuZBpKCO9GjfQCeIqTw
zZrDShvEv/0RewS0cvDQ2sU=
=ZCIQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to