-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> woody/unstable (libc3.x maybe? I don't remember.) that were dependencies. Because you wrote that often enought now: "woody" is not "unstable" or "testing" but the current "stable", maybe you should take a look at http://www.debian.org to get this right: "woody" == current "stable" "sarge" == current "testing" "sid" == always "unstable" It is annoying and hard to track what you mean when you mix this up completely. BTW: I don't understand why most unstable packages are not in unstable anymore. KDE3.x ist left out because of gcc3.2, although it does not make much sense: if it breaks on transistion to gcc3.2- well, it's unstable. Same with XFree4.2. What's the difference to make the gcc change with or without KDE3 in unstable? It compiles with gcc2.95 and troubles with gcc3.2 are expected anyway. Sorry, but it does not make much sense to me at all. This is no matter to me though because I track testing and not unstable. But current behaviour makes unstable rather pointless. HS - -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de oder über pgp.net PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9lJzpzvr6q9zCwcERAhSDAJ9CCSVndeCaWflQRp0Y/FLwC1FJxACgjVxv nbp0lnoIHEe4fbM5cNWLONg= =9Zz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
