On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:44:55 +0200, Dirk Schmidt wrote: >Am Montag, 19. August 2002 15:14 schrieb Daniel Stone: >> > Will be these packages installable on Woody/stable or there are >> > dependencies from the testing/unstable repository as with 3.0.2 kde debs >> > from http://kde3.geniussystems.net/debian ./ ? >> >> It's compiled against unstable (sid), however you can use it on testing >> by pulling a couple of packages back from unstable (apt-get -f install). >> >> Sadly, however, one of those packages is the new libc6, and you'll need >> to pull a new apache, etc, for that. > >What do you think about compiling 3.0.3 on woody against the woody's libraries >and sid's qt3.0.5? I do not want to mix up woody and sid too much -especially >libc.
<AOL>me too</AOL> Ah .. it seems cheeky to ask, but I'd really like to see packages compiled against vanilla Woody too. (new libc ... scary stuff .. mumble ..) Is it possible ? Is the new libc required because of the switch to gcc 3.2 ? (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) If so, can we use gcc 2.95 instead (as well) ? With the reported speedups and all in KDE3, surely the credibility of Debian's premier just-released stable version would benefit from KDE 3.0.3 being in the optional feature set. Quite apart from the speedups and doodads, there's that oh-so-important Konqui-SSL fix. If a Woody KDE 3.0.3 isn't possible, would it be possible for someone to produce a binary deb of the patched 2.2.2 version of kdelibs-kssl ? (Actually, shouldn't a 2.2.2 fixed kdelibs-kssl appear as a Debian security fix ?) Okay okay - Chris & Daniel gotta have a life - I'll shut up :) [ Hey if I can provide manual labour I'm happy to help, but I'm only a novice C++ programmer so I'd have to be led most steps of the way :( ] Cheers, Nick Boyce Bristol, UK -- Baruch's Observation: If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
