This is fine if you want to do this, but I am of the opinion that putting up KDE3 now is superfluous work since it is on the verge of its stable release. I think if we wait a little longer, we would benefit more since we will eventually have to compile that anyway and compiling takes a while.
Rene On Tuesday 26 February 2002 12:29 am, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:28:08PM +0000, Kyle Gordon wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 22:42, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > > > not much heard about KDE3.deb lately. Are there any KDE3 > > > alpha/experimental debs around? Until last time when I worked upstream > > > on karm Ivan's alpha stuff did fine for me, but that's no longer the > > > case it seems. > > I have experimental .deb's which do not work. Everything segfaults on > load, I'm going to check this out, but it could be due to a botched > local qt3 install. > > > > I'd really could use *any* quality of KDE-head debs, I only need to be > > > able to aproximately compile and start some stuff to check features > > > etc. It doesn't have to be anything near perfect or stable. > > Give me 24 hours or so. > > > I'm new to the list, so forgive me if I ask silly questions :-p > > > > On a related note to Tomas' post, I noticed KDE3 (well, the splash > > screen at least :-) went into the unstable release a few weeks ago, but > > as of yet there has been no further updates. Is this normal practice, or > > does KDE take a little bit longer to settle in with Debian?? > > KDE3 is not in unstable, and won't be for some time. -- Alternate email addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
