On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 03:24:09PM -0500, James Lindenschmidt wrote: > Forgive my newbieness, but it seems you are saying that unstable is actually > more stable than testing. Since I am primarily a user who wants a good [snip]
I run stable on my edge servers, no X, no problems. For my workstations (home and work) and my laptop, I run unstable. I've generally found that packages in unstable are either (A) Fine, or (B) so borked (dependencies or whatever) that they don't even run. Turns out, the times I've run testing, it's the little tweaks that are made to adjust this and that in the approach to a "stable" Woody, that breaks my system more often and worse than the sometimes BIG changes that happen in unstable. I'm thinking Lorentz Attractor, here. heh .brian -- Brian Bilbrey "The ships hung in the sky in [EMAIL PROTECTED] much the same way that bricks don't." www.orbdesigns.com Doug Adams, H2G
