-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 18 Oct 2001 12:40 am, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2001 00:58 schrieb Russell Coker: > > I notice that you are sending PGP/GPG signed email with kmail, so I > > presume that it's working OK for you. > > > > When I see your messages GPG takes ages to process the signature (a > > minute or more on a P3-650). So I generally run "killall gpg" in another > > window. > > > > How do you find gpg performance with kmail? What do you suggest that I > > look at to try and solve the problem? > > That is when gpg times out. Kmail waits for gpg to check the signature. > When you have a keyserver mentioned in .gnupg/options, then gpg might need > a little bit longer. Nothing wrong there. > I had this problem with Davids mails, too, but I do not know where I got > his public key file from. Once in the list of the installed-keys, the > problem vanished.
You can add no-auto-key-retrieve to .gnupg/options to (you guessed it) disable automatic key retrieval. This means you can still have a keyserver in the options file and just use gpg --recv-keys when you feel like it. Does anyone know if there are any plans for asynchronous gpg in kmail? (i.e. progress bar, ability to kill...) I once thought about putting it in myself but as usual I had no time... =( - -- Chris Boyle - Winchester College - http://archives.wincoll.ac.uk/ ICQ: 24151961 - PGP: http://archives.wincoll.ac.uk/finger.php?q=chrisb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7zjBNRi6ArLfYbg8RAsnFAJ96zFFjAbXYXCzgqFhlEaKnAehlawCfWI1g Dv18lD1X6M2o0C2ArNHTB3I= =gERY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----