On Thursday 31 May 2001 04:02, Scott E. Graves wrote: <snip> > First of all, 90% of the time woody is broken. If it's a > leading-edge dist you're looking for, use sid. Your system coulkd > be rendered useless ussing the woody tree.
But woody is sid + a couple of of (critical?) bug-free days. Woody should in principle be more stable than sid. Only problem I see is the security updates.
