Even so, the 'L' in kmail does not reply to just the list, but those listed in the 'To:' AND the 'Cc:' lines, similar to 'reply-all'. That is how I responded to this message. [Sorry folks for doubling your mail input, just making a point ;^) ]
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 07:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > Er, maybe it can't. The caption under "Message" indicates an upper > case *L* which also fails, though the lower case causes this action. > What'd I miss? > > On Tuesday 08 May 2001 16:54, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tuesday, 8. May 2001 23:01, Viktor Lakics wrote: > > > Ákos, why don't you use the "L" (list reply) feature of mutt. > > > This only replys to the particular list you are replying to... > > > > and even kmail in 2.1.1 can do this :-) > > > > HS -- 73, JC Portlock KE6UME [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 14481033 =========================================== Professionals built the Titanic, but Amateurs built the Ark. =========================================== Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
