On Wednesday 04 April 2001 15:22, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > Damn. I dunno if you follow kfm-devel (it's not like you have a ton of > > free time), but a guy just posted a short patch that commented out the > > offending line(s). I don't suppose you want to fork the entire konq > > codebase and keep a seperate source-tree, dealing with keeping your tree > > up-to-date via patches and diffs, all to make my life a little easier, do > > you? You do?? Great! You're the best ;-) > > > > Or, I could break down and either compile it myself or figure out why > > it's still b0rken. Naw, that's too much work.... B) > > you don't think I"m keeping my own patch db? :)
Do you know how much I would appreciate you commenting that section out? I'd almost go so far as to say thanks. Effusively. ;-) If you want a link to the patch, I can dig it up. D.A.Bishop
