Two questions: (1) Are the kde.tdyc debs. pure potato?
(2) If I download the unstable .debs (wherever they may be) into my local .deb repository (applying dpkg-scanpackages on them and thereby making them locally apt-gettable for my testing system): Would the dependencies for non-KDE/qt apps come from unstable? Or are the kde .debs so packaged that they would pull from whatever source (either stable/testing/unstable) available regardless of version number. On Friday 09 March 2001 03:20, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 05:54:16PM +0100, Thibaut Cousin wrote: > > Ivan, you told us one or two days ago that those using testing > > should take the KDE packages for woody, not those for potato. > > You mean, take them from the package pool ? > > The problem if I do that is that I have to point to unstable > > instead of testing... is there another place I can make apt-get > > point to ? Testing is OK for me, but I don't want unstable. > > I mean take them however you feel comfortable taking them. The > latest version of apt allows one to have multiple apt lines and > pull from specific pools... > > aptget install kdebase/unstable > > for example...(not sure if that's the exact command line...) > > so that's one option,the other is to go and download the packages > directly out of the pool...my personal favorite is to run > unstable..as it's far better than testing. > > Ivan
