Source: jardiff Version: 0.2-5.1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Damien Raude-Morvan <draz...@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, Package Salvaging Team <team+salv...@tracker.debian.org>
Hi, I'm currently checking packages in Debian Java team featuring 1. Invalid Vcs fields 2. cdbs to fix the Vcs fields and replace cdbs by dh. I'm also verifying Homepage and watch file, etc. I learned that the Homepage associated with the current jardiff package vanished from the internet. When seeking for a new location I've found https://github.com/lightbend-labs/jardiff which is actively maintained. I wonder whether we should go the "remove old jardiff + introduce new jardiff via new" route or whether it is OK to just inject the new project and add the change in NEWS.Debian. I have no strong opinion here since I do not use this package. So any input is welcome. I would volunteer to implement what might be consensus of the discussion. Kind regards Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE:de Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
