tags 834053 + confirmed upstream
found 834053 openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1
found 834053 openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1
thanks
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Nobuhiro Ban wrote:
> Or, should I send this report to upstream?
This would be appreciated. While we can fix that in the
Debian copies of openjdk-8, and probably Doko can fix it
in 11 and 17 as well, there’d still be differing behaviour.
Once fixed upstream applying it to all versions is easier.
@Doko: or what do you think? The diff is a one-liner
bye,
//mirabilos
--
>> Why don't you use JavaScript? I also don't like enabling JavaScript in
> Because I use lynx as browser.
+1
-- Octavio Alvarez, me and ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ (Mario Lang) on debian-devel
