Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 15.04.2021, 07:16 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > Hi Markus, > > No objections from me. It's nice the artifactId is httpclient5, so we > can name the JAR the same and the package should co-installable with the > the 4.x series. (I only checked the main JAR, hopefully that holds true > for ancillary JARs as well.)
Thanks for your and Emmanuel's feedback. I have finished the packaging and just uploaded the new httpcore5 and httpclient5 source packages to NEW. The new artifacts are co-installable. I had to patch both packages because we currently miss Conscrypt[1] and RxJava[2] in Debian. However both dependencies were optional or were only needed for testing, so I believe we should be fine here at the moment. httpcomponents-client5 also needed a newer version of libehcache-java. We still use the 2.x version for a couple of reverse- dependencies including the older httpcomponents-client. I don't know if it makes sense to create a new libehcache3-java package or if we should try to upgrade the r-deps. For now I've opted for removing one class but this one is probably not optional and should be fixed in the future. Cheers, Markus [1] https://www.conscrypt.org/ [2] https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
