Le 20/05/2019 à 13:54, Aleksey Shipilev a écrit : > Right. Maybe then "-ea" or "-preview" in version tag would communicate that > intent more clearly, on > the off-chance "stretch" users would install openjdk-11, thinking it is > somehow stable.
Do you think the 11.0.3+1 package in stretch is affected by serious issues compared to the GA release that should be addressed quickly? > Excellent, do you have any rough ETA? Having 11.0.4+x in "unstable" > (preferably with "-ea" suffix) > and 11.0.3+7 in "testing"/"stable" would be the good state for the current > moment. That may happen later this week if no other update is uploaded in unstable and the release team approves the transition (that's a big "if" because testing is currently in deep freeze, and the previous minor update 11.0.2 broke a ton of packages due to javadoc changes). A likely outcome is that Debian 10 gets released with OpenJDK 11.0.3+1 and receives a 11.0.4 update after the release. > Yup, would be nice if outlier like the current one does not happen again. I > think you can always > check with upstream 8u/11u maintainers if the tags you're building from are > sane for "stable", > especially if you cannot see the -ga tags in the upstream repo. I've just noticed the new *-ga tags added recently to the OpenJDK 8/11 repositories, that's a very welcome change. That will allow us to write debian/watch files detecting the release tags. Emmanuel Bourg
