On 20 June 2018 at 14:05, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Carnë, > > Le 20/06/2018 à 14:54, Carnë Draug a écrit : > >> I'm trying to prepare a new release of imagej [1]. When building in >> sid with openjdk-10 the java-doc packages includes jquery, jquery-ui, >> jszip, and jszip-utils. I'm guessing this should be using the system >> versions of those javascript libraries. Even lintian says so. >> >> How can I fix this? > > You can't, and IMHO this Lintian warning should be ignored as far as > javadocs are concerned. The javadoc isn't bound to the system it was > produced on, it can be zipped and exported to another system. > > That's why the javadoc tool can't be patched to replace its copy of > jquery with a symlink to the script provided by the Debian jquery > package. This would render the javadoc produced non exportable. > > Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Thanks for the answer. That explains why the javadoc tool can't be patched in Debian to do it. But javadoc has options to replace links to referenced classes to javadocs in the local filesystem. Following that logic, this would render the javadoc produced non exportable. Still, not only is that not a problem, it's part of the Debian java policy. I just noticed that even openjdk-10-doc has them. The easiest fix for libraries would be to, after the javadoc build, replace the jquery directory with a symlink to the openjdk documentation if the jquery directory exists there. I'm not sure how to go about doing that or how to find the correct path for the symlink. Thank you David
