On 19.09.2017 09:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 19/09/2017 à 08:27, Timo Aaltonen a écrit : > >> Actually, the alternative would be to upload 3.0.19 with an epoch. And >> since pki-base is the only package that depends on it this would be safe >> to do. > > I'd prefer an extra package rather than using an epoch. Either way, > there are 6 CVEs open against resteasy, I'm not sure the security team > will be happy with that. > > What errors do you get when building dogtag with the version 3.1?
I can fix the build errors where ClientResponseType was moved to resteasy-legacy.jar, but starting the instance still fails: https://pagure.io/dogtagpki/issue/2596 and nothing useful in the logs -- t