07.04.2016, 11:03, "Eugene Zhukov": > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: >> 06.04.2016, 09:57, "Eugene Zhukov": >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: >>>> >>> >>> [...] >>>> Feel free to add more libraries. >>> >>> Could you please add Saxon-HE (www.saxonica.com)? >>> https://www.saxonica.co.uk/repos/archive/opensource/tags/ >> >> Hi, >> >> The report for the library has been added at: >> http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/timeline/saxon-he/ >> >> Please check the report and let me know if there are any false positives or >> negatives in the report. >> >> Feel free to request more libraries if interested. > > There are more versions in the report, than tags at [1]. I guess > that's how upstream develops and what chooses to tag. It would be nice > to see diff between tags (only) starting from version 9.5.1.1. > Thank you very much for working on this! > > Eugene > > [1] https://www.saxonica.co.uk/repos/archive/opensource/tags/
Hello, I've created reports for all releases from the public SF repository of the library: https://sourceforge.net/projects/saxon/files/Saxon-HE/ Why some of them shouldn't be analyzed? They can be used by the community, so I think that reports for them should be presented in the tracker. Thank you.
