On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Martin Steghöfer wrote: > So is it the official Debian position
There cannot be an official Debian position on this, either it’s so or not, based on law ;-) > that interfaces are not protected by copyright law? I'm not an expert IANAL either, but interoperability is a big thing in the EU, although it’s more about data, from what we heard at the talk one or two FOSDEMs ago (Zack was there too). But even for the USA (AIUI) it’s valid that facts cannot be protected by copyright, which requires creativity. “We have a method x that takes an integer and a string and returns an integer and throws no exceptions, and a method y that doesn't take any arguments and returns void, and call this the interface z” is a fact. If there’s exactly one way to write that down in the programming language Java, then that is a fact, too. (I don’t know Java well, but from what I’ve seen, an interface looks like a class devoid of code.) > at all. I've heard about the big lawsuit Oracle vs. Google about the > Android interfaces, but I thought that applied only to the US. Is that Much of this was about the implementation of these interfaces, which is something different, and then there was actual allegedly-copied code. I didn’t monitor the outcome. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.11.1502241258540.28...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
