Le 16/07/2014 00:07, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > This is nonsense. Not yet - not as long we want/need gcj (on some archs).
Fair enough. But we already have a lot of packages incompatible with gcj in Jessie. What are the Java applications we want/need on these archs? We should probably document them and ensure their dependencies are not updated in a way that renders them incompatible with gcj. And when the transition to Java 9 starts these packages could be compiled with the Eclipse compiler instead of javac. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c5b844.3000...@apache.org
