Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:22:03 +0100
with message-id <52ece6eb.5080...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#732282: stop building java for sparc, sparc64, s390,
kfreebsd-any
has caused the Debian Bug report #732282,
regarding stop building java for sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
732282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: java-common
Version: 0.50
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie, sid
openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please
either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj.
- the hotspot port for linux sparc isn't maintained anymore
by upstream. If a porter is interested, maybe investigate
how to build the zero vm on these architectures.
- s390 needs an update of the s390 debian specific patch. Not
working on this myself.
- the debian kfreebsd patches need an update. I don't think
it's feasible to burden the openjdk maintainers or the
security team with patch maintenance. I understand that
the bsd support is found upstream in openjdk-8, so maybe
try that again for the next upstream version.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2013-12-16 11:34, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: java-common
> Version: 0.50
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie, sid
>
> openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please
> either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj.
>
> - the hotspot port for linux sparc isn't maintained anymore
> by upstream. If a porter is interested, maybe investigate
> how to build the zero vm on these architectures.
>
> - s390 needs an update of the s390 debian specific patch. Not
> working on this myself.
>
> - the debian kfreebsd patches need an update. I don't think
> it's feasible to burden the openjdk maintainers or the
> security team with patch maintenance. I understand that
> the bsd support is found upstream in openjdk-8, so maybe
> try that again for the next upstream version.
>
>
Uploaded java-common/0.51 with the relevant changes, but forgot to add a
"Closes" for this bug.
In other news, icedtea-web needs to drop its icedtea-6-plugin package
and OpenJDK-7 needs to migrate to testing. Once that happens we are
ready to remove OpenJDK-6 from testing (and gcc-4.4, which is only
blocked by OpenJDK-7).
~Niels
--- End Message ---
