Hey Scott, It has been said that "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things." -- Phil Karlton :-)
The binary package was of the most concern to me, because that's what users will look for when installing. I actually have no experience with Java packaging, so I'm not sure what the conventions are there. Personally, my preference would be for source + binary packages to be the same name. I used to work on packaging Perl libraries mainly, and in that case, our convention was generally to stick with the lib*-perl pattern, for both source and binary packages. Initially, we also did this for applications (e.g. libcpanminus-perl), but later decided to go with just application names (i.e. cpanminus) in cases where the application is meant to be used standalone and not as a library. We codified these conventions in the policy for the Debian Perl Group [0]. Whether something is more appropriately a library or application requires some discretion on the part of the packaging Debian contributor/developer, of course. And I'm not sure what to name the source package in a case where there is both a library and application component. I guess the analogue with Perl modules is also different because upstream Perl package names (Module::Name) are not valid Debian package names anyway, so they have to be transmogrified to fit our convention, and lib*-perl seems as fine a convention as any. Does apt-get source expect the source package name, or will it also work with binary package names? If I do "apt-get source libupnp-java", will it download the sbbi-upnplib package? If so, then this seems to be an especially trivial point, and I'd be happy with either name. In any case, since I'm not an expert here, let's see if someone on the debian-java list chimes in :-) Cheers, Jonathan [0] http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html#package_naming_policy On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Scott Howard <showard...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > The binary package is named libupnp-java, seen here: > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sbbi-upnplib.git;a=blob;f=debian/control;h=8014fb5b4d2c3eb60968caaa6c239562002dd9f7;hb=HEAD > > I named the source package to match the name of the upstream tarball > file (sbbi-upnplib-1.0.4.tar.gz) I struggled with either naming the > source package the same as the binary package, or to name it like I > suggest here. Since upstream refers to the project as sbbi-upnplib and > their tarball had that in it, I'm leaning toward keeping the name what > they call it. It will be discoverable since the binary package has the > proper java library package name. I was worried about it not being > discoverable if I didn't put the sbbi-upnplib source package name. > > Given that, do you still think it should be renamed? I don't mind either way. > > ~Scott > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Jonathan Yu <jaw...@cpan.org> wrote: >> Hey Scott, >> >> I don't presume to be an expert here, but I wanted to mention that the >> package name specified in your ITP does not match the usual >> conventions for libraries in Debian, nor for Java libraries >> specifically: >> >> "Java libraries packages must be named libXXX[version]-java (without >> the brackets)" [0] >> >> Might you consider renaming this package to make it more easily discoverable? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jonathan >> >> [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x104.html >> >> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Scott Howard <show...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Package: wnpp >>> Severity: wishlist >>> Owner: Scott Howard <show...@debian.org> >>> >>> * Package name : sbbi-upnplib >>> Version : 1.0.4 >>> Upstream Author : SuperBonBon Industries >>> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/p/triplea/code/HEAD/tree/upnp/ >>> * License : Apache-1.1 >>> Programming Lang: Java >>> Description : Java library for universal plug and play (upnp) >>> >>> This is a dependency of the newest versions of the triplea package. To be >>> maintained under the java team umbrella. >>> Initial repo: >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sbbi-upnplib.git >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org >>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >>> listmas...@lists.debian.org >>> Archive: >>> http://lists.debian.org/20140119223359.15198.7602.report...@esc-303123.ee.nd.edu >>> >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org >> Archive: >> http://lists.debian.org/camdxsejlkidda__v6lfzbe+iaf0j5yocl6uoaongoq0rr3z...@mail.gmail.com >> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMDxSEixBGYau9+Uv=s2dwsir8xph0t35hrhwozfhsbkv9u...@mail.gmail.com
