Le 23/10/2013 22:08, "Steffen Möller" a écrit :

> First off - I am impressed. Then, there will with some good confidence be a 
> plexus-utils 4 coming and we have a bit of the same ugly non-monotonity in 
> "sonames" that we have now. I hence suggest to craft plexus-utils3 and ask 
> for the removal of plexus-utils...or just leave it for now.

Introducing a plexus-utils3 package means we'll have to transition 75
packages depending on libplexus-utils-java and 7 packages depending on
libplexus-utils2-java to the new libplexus-utils3-java. And if we care
about the numbering consistency we'll would have to do this again when
plexus-utils 4 is released.

By simply upgrading the existing libplexus-utils-java package we end up
with only 7 packages to transition. This solution is much easier, and my
tests show that the risk of incompatibility is very low.

Emmanuel Bourg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5268da49.1070...@apache.org

Reply via email to