Am 23.03.2013 08:53, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Hilko Bengen <ben...@debian.org> wrote: >> * Sylvestre Ledru: >> >>> Asking several times the same question won't help you with that ... >>> You should focus on packaging itself. >> >> Way to go, telling people in a largely volunteer-based community what >> their priorities should be... > > Well Thomas is trying to tell us -SVN users- what we should do... > > I'd like to second Sylvestre opinion. I am a very happy SVN user, and > I'd like to keep my package workflow as-is. > > If thomas wants to change the default/prefered way debian java package > should be, then fine. But he should not come back every now and then, > with argument like: > > So who *still* cares about SVN for packaging > > The only VCS in debian is DAK in the end, so I do not see why I should > change anything in my packages. So to answer Thomas's question: yes I > do *still* care about my package in SVN.
+1. btw, Thomas is trying to do the same for packages maintained by the python-modules team too :-/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/514f67d2.1070...@debian.org
