On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Thomas Koch <tho...@koch.ro> wrote:

> Mathieu Malaterre:
> > > If there are jars in /usr/share/java which are not also present in
> > > /usr/share/maven-repo then this is most likely an issue of the
> respective
> > > Debian package. Please fill a bug against the debian package in this
> case
> > > so that somebody can update the package to provide maven artifacts.
> >
> > That's the whole point. Maven is not part of the requirements from
> > Debian Java policy.
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
> >
> > There is absolutely no requirement for a packager to include the maven
> > stuff within a java package AFAIK.
>
> Ok. Let this be a wishlist bug. I did not want to say that this would be a
> bug
> in the package (I justed the word "issue"). But if somebody does the work
> it
> is most likely that the java library can be updated to provide the maven
> artifacts.
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>
>
Leaving policies and politics aside, what would be the right way to solve
this?

What are the rules mh_make wants (asks for) when it finds necessary jars
from /usr/share/java?
Running mh_make --from-svn=
https://xslthl.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xslthl/tags/xslthl-2.1.0
...
This dependency cannot be found in the Debian Maven repository. Ignore this
dependency?
  saxon:saxon:jar:[6.5,7.0]
y/[n] > n
> dpkg --search /usr/share/maven-repo/saxon/saxon
dpkg failed to execute successfully
> apt-file search /usr/share/maven-repo/saxon/saxon
> dpkg --search /usr/share/java/saxon.jar
Found libsaxon-java
[error] Package libsaxon-java does not contain Maven dependency
saxon:saxon:jar:[6.5,7.0] but there seem to be a match
If the package contains already Maven artifacts but the names don't match,
try to enter a substitution rule
of the form s/groupId/newGroupId/ s/artifactId/newArtifactId/ jar
s/version/newVersion/ here:
>
...

Or, perhaps, I can/shall solve these dependencies when packaging by adding
some
mh_installpoms/mh_installjars commands into debian/rules?

Br,
Eugene

Reply via email to