tony mancill: > Hello Thomas, > > The packaging builds fine, but I think there is a bit more work to do on > debian/copyright. The following files carry a BSD license: > > ./src/com/google/debugging/sourcemap/Base64VLQ.java: BSD (3 clause) > ./test/com/google/debugging/sourcemap/Base64VLQTest.java: BSD (3 clause) > > Also, now that there is a build-dep on librhino, can the following trees > be pruned from repacked tarball? The files under these directories are > dual licensed under the MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0. > > ./src/com/google/javascript/rhino/ > ./test/com/google/javascript/rhino/
Hi Tony, thank you for the review. My bad that I trusted the license information on the project page and did not run licensecheck myself. I pushed an addition to d/copyright to the git repo. Should I also delete and reupload to debian mentors? I also opened issues upstream to see whether they want to clean up on their part. The embedded rhino code however is modifed and thus can not just be purged by us. Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303041811.56078.tho...@koch.ro
